Blog
Europe's indirect tax function in 2026: 3 numbers that tell the story
5 Oct 2026

The indirect tax function is changing faster now than at any point in recent memory.
Across Europe, tax teams are working through an unprecedented convergence of regulatory change, e-invoicing mandates, AI adoption and growing expectations from the business. To understand how organisations are responding, Thomson Reuters Institute surveyed 230 indirect tax professionals across nine European markets.
The results reveal a function in transition: increasingly strategic, increasingly technology-driven, yet still constrained by familiar challenges around resources, data and organisational recognition. Three numbers in particular tell that story.
87%: E-invoicing has moved from planning to execution
For years, e-invoicing was viewed as a future compliance challenge. In 2026, it has become an operational reality.
87% of respondents say their organisation is already live with e-invoicing, implementing solutions for upcoming mandates or formally planning for future requirements. The question for most businesses is no longer whether they need to respond, but how they can do so efficiently and at scale.
That shift matters because mandate implementation reaches far beyond the tax team. It affects how transaction data moves between systems, how finance and tax work together, and how quickly organisations can adapt as requirements diverge across jurisdictions. A local, deadline-by-deadline response may achieve short-term compliance, but it can also add another layer of complexity to an already fragmented operating environment.
The report also finds that organisations are seeing benefits beyond meeting the mandate itself, particularly in the quality and structure of their data and their preparedness for scrutiny from tax authorities. This changes the strategic case for e-invoicing. What begins as a regulatory requirement can become the foundation for cleaner processes, stronger controls and more consistent visibility across the business.
The opportunity for indirect tax leaders is therefore to resist treating each mandate as an isolated compliance project. The stronger approach is to use the mandate wave to establish reusable data, governance and technology capabilities that can support the next country requirement as well as the current one.
10%: The biggest automation opportunity remains largely untapped
If one statistic captures the gap between ambition and execution, it may be this one.
Only 10% of respondents say their organisation has fully automated data reconciliation across systems, even though reconciliation is one of the activities tax teams most want to automate. The priority is clear. The operational reality has yet to catch up.
Reconciliation sits at the fault line between tax, finance and technology. Information may need to move across ERP platforms, tax engines, e-invoicing systems and local reporting tools before a team can be confident that the underlying transaction data is complete and accurate. When those connections are weak, people become the integration layer, manually comparing records, investigating discrepancies and correcting data before filing or reporting can proceed.
This is not simply an efficiency issue. Manual reconciliation consumes capacity that could otherwise be used to interpret regulatory change, advise the business or improve controls. It can also make it harder to scale as transaction volumes and digital reporting obligations increase.
The finding exposes a broader transformation challenge. Tax teams can identify the process that needs attention, but fixing it often depends on investment and decisions outside their direct control. Sustainable automation requires aligned data standards, system integration, clear ownership and early involvement from Finance and IT. Buying another tool without addressing those foundations risks automating only part of the problem.
For indirect tax leaders, reconciliation is therefore a useful place to make transformation tangible. It connects an everyday operational burden with a measurable business case: fewer manual interventions, faster issue resolution, stronger data confidence and more capacity for higher-value work.
Inside Europe's indirect tax function in 2026
The pressure is rising for businesses to meet e-invoicing mandates and expectations for automating indirect tax functions. See how tax professionals across nine European markets are responding to these changes in the 2026 indirect tax report by Thomson Reuters Institute. The report examines:
- How organisations are responding to regulatory change
- Why data reconciliation remains a significant challenge
- How indirect tax teams influence wider business decisions
- Which opportunities are shaping the future of indirect tax

28%: Strategic influence is growing, but recognition is lagging
Perhaps the most revealing number in the research has nothing to do with technology.
Just 28% of respondents describe their indirect tax function’s contribution to organisational objectives as "significant." Yet the wider findings show tax teams shaping decisions well beyond filing and reporting, including supply chains, pricing, contracts and the management of regulatory risk.
This is the report’s central tension. The indirect tax function is becoming more commercially relevant, but the way its success is measured still tends to emphasise traditional compliance outcomes. Accuracy and timeliness remain essential, but they say little about the value created when tax input prevents disruption, informs a market decision or helps the organisation respond more quickly to regulatory change.
That creates an invisible value problem. If strategic contribution is not captured, it is difficult to communicate. If it is difficult to communicate, it is harder to secure the technology, skills and organisational support needed to deepen that contribution.
The report suggests that more proactive functions behave differently. They are more likely to connect technology investment with business outcomes, engage senior leaders and treat regulatory change as a catalyst for transformation. The lesson is not that compliance measures should disappear, but that the scorecard must expand alongside the role.
For tax leaders, this means translating activity into outcomes the wider organisation recognises. Rather than reporting only that obligations were met, the function can show where its work protected continuity, accelerated readiness, reduced manual effort or influenced a commercial decision. That is how indirect tax begins to move from being seen as a necessary control to being understood as a strategic asset.
The story behind the numbers
Taken together, these three figures describe a profession at a crossroads.
The mandate era has arrived, but organisations need to decide whether implementation will create another layer of fragmentation or become the foundation for broader transformation. Automation ambition is high, but progress depends on solving the underlying data and governance problems. And indirect tax teams are influencing increasingly important business decisions, even though their contribution is not always visible in the metrics used to evaluate them.
The future indirect tax function will not be defined by compliance alone. It will be defined by how effectively organisations turn regulatory change into better data, more scalable operations and stronger business influence.
That is the real story emerging from Europe’s indirect tax function in 2026.
Automate indirect tax processes with ONESOURCE Pagero
Keep exploring
Join our community
Keep exploring
Get in touch
Interested in getting started or learning more? Leave your contact details here and we will reach out to you!